// you’re reading...

Featured

Protest Tony Blair’s memoirs

Stop the War have organised a protest outside of Tony Blair’s upcoming book launch:

“Tony Blair clearly thinks that by donating the millions he is being paid for his memoirs to the British Legion he will wash his hands clean of the hundreds of thousands of civilians and the 179 British soldiers killed as a result of war in Iraq.”

It won’t stop Peter Brierley, whose son was killed in Iraq, who says his aim is still; “that one day we will see Tony Blair in court for the crimes he committed. Peter famously refused to shake Blair’s hand at a memorial service for soldiers who died in Iraq, saying, “Don’t you dare. “You have my son’s blood on your hands.”

Deirdre Gover, whose son Kristian was also killed in Iraq, spoke to Blair at the same service: “I said to him ‘You have created an unjust conflict and killed my son’. And he said ‘Oh, let’s discuss it’ and he asked me if I understood about Saddam Hussein.” She walked off in disgust.

The money Blair is donating from his memoirs will be welcome for those soldiers it helps who have been seriously injured in Britain’s wars.

But no amount of money can buy Blair innocence or forgiveness for the series of lies he told against the best legal advice which told him the war was illegal under international law, or for his defiance of the vast majority of people in Britain, who protested in unprecedented numbers to tell Blair that his warmongering was “not in our name”.

On Wednesday 8 September, Blair will doing a book-signing at Waterstone’s bookshop in London’s Piccadilly to launch the publication of his memoirs. There has already been widespread criticism of his potential earnings from a book which will inevitably be an attempt to whitewash Blair’s monumental crimes, which should have seen him behind bars long ago.

But in addition, the cost of the security operation to protect Blair while he does the book-signing, is expected to be over £100,000 taken from the public purse, which will be added to the £150,000 a year we pay him for his pension and to fund his office.

Tony Blair is a war criminal who — if international law means anything at all — would have been indicted long ago. Which is why Stop the War Coalition is calling on everyone who is appalled at Waterstone’s giving a platform for Blair to promote a book which will inevitably aim to justify those crimes, to write to Waterstones by letter and email and call on them to cancel the book-signing.

In the event that they do not, Stop the War will organise a protest at the Piccadilly Waterstones on 8 September to ensure that the voice of the anti-war majority in this country is represented outside the bookshop, and will call on its local Stop the War groups around the country to organise protests at the same time outside Waterstones shops in their area.

Read this full article at stopwar.org.uk

Discussion

One Response to “Protest Tony Blair’s memoirs”

  1. Arrest Tony Blair for war crimes, with the one two we got you citizens arrest;
    A citizen’s arrest is an arrest made by a person who is not acting as a sworn law-enforcement official.[1] In common law jurisdictions, the practice dates back to medieval Britain and the English common law, in which sheriffs encouraged ordinary citizens to help apprehend law breakers.
    A citizen’s arrest (officially called an “any person arrest”) is permitted to be made on any person under section 24A of the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 for an indictable offence, including either way offences (in this section referred to simply as “an offence”), but excluding certain specific ones listed below. It is thus permissible for any person to arrest:

    Anyone who is without doubt in the act of committing an offence, or whom the arrestor has reasonable grounds for suspecting to be in the act of committing an offence, and
    Where an offence has been committed without doubt, anyone who is without doubt guilty of that offence or whom the arrestor has reasonable grounds for suspecting to be guilty of it
    In order for the arrest to be lawful, the following two conditions must also be satisfied:

    It appears to the person making the arrest that it is not reasonably practicable for a constable to make the arrest instead
    The arrestor has reasonable grounds for believing that the arrest is necessary to prevent one of the following:
    The person causing physical injury to himself or others
    The person suffering physical injury
    The person causing loss of or damage to property
    The person absconding before a constable can assume responsibility for him
    The person being able to violate a restraint order
    Use of the second power above is rather risky, since it relies upon the person carrying out the arrest knowing that an indictable or either way offence has been committed. If, for example, the arrested person is later acquitted in court, then it could be concluded that no offence has been committed; thus, the arrest would be unlawful. The Act therefore gives a constable additional powers to arrest the following:

    Anyone who is (without doubt) about to commit an offence, or whom the constable has reasonable grounds for suspecting to be about to commit an offence
    Anyone whom the constable has reasonable grounds for suspecting to be guilty of an offence which is merely suspected to have taken place
    A constable’s arrest power is not limited to indictable offences and conditions different from the above apply.

    Current score: 0

    Posted by Radfax | 17. Aug, 2010, 3:23 pm

Post a comment

Photos on flickr